Many of these issues are more easily managed if all communications are part of the official city communication plan. As we note in the “ Elected Officials Guide” blog, if you blog about public business, make sure your blog is public, not private, or you could run afoul of the First Amendment. Third, if this website is considered to be an officially city-sanctioned communication tool you may be limited in whether you can block subscribers or delete comments. See our FAQ “ What is a serial meeting?” for more details on serial meetings. Second, if a quorum of your fellow councilmembers comments on your website (assuming you intend to allow two-way communications) it raises the possibility of there being an illegal serial meeting. This would require you to archive your website for the time required by state law and to produce responsive records if the city gets a public records request. First, depending on your city’s policies, anything you write could be considered a public record. There are three main concerns with maintaining your own website for city-related communications. Second is to look at MRSC's Social Media Policies topic page and our blog post on Elected Officials Guide - What's Personal and What's Public? The first thing we would suggest is to look at your city code and council rules as they relate to social media usage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |